TAMRON 18-270 vs NIKON 18-200
click on any photo to ENLARGE

 

October 1, 2008.  I received my Tamron lens today and added a B&W UV-haze filter.  The following photos were taken with my tripod mounted Nikon D90, set for "jpeg normal" and aperture priority at F8.   After taking the 18-270 photos, the lens was swapped to the Nikon 18-200.  I didn't have sufficient time to match mm with mm, so I just eyeballed the settings and started shooting.  There was no post processing.

NOTE:  Enlarged files are over a 2.9 megabytes each.

TAMRON 18-270:

      18mm                  35mm                42mm                 50mm              70mm

                   

 

       100mm               185mm              200mm             270mm

              

 

 

NIKON 18-200:

      18mm                  35mm                50mm                 135mm            200mm

                   

 

October 1, 2008:  Photography is one of my hobbies and I expect expert comparisons from the Pros will be available soon.  Having the lens for just a few hours here are my initial findings:

1.  I believe my Tamron is at least equal to the Nikon 18-200 in picture quality.  

2.  My Tamron has the same "lens creep" as the NIkon.  The Tamron has a Lock switch at the 18mm position for walking around.

3.  My Tamron zoom mechanism has a slightly annoying resistance at the 70-100 mm spot.  If the camera is pointed down, the zoom is smooth, suggesting more of a design compromise rather than a mechanical defect.

October 2, 2008 hand held shooting, indoors, with and without flash:

1.  My subjective rating is that the images look sharp, with excellent color and contrast.

2.  The VC stabilization seems to work very well.

3.  The slightly annoying resistance at the 70-100 mm spot is smoothing out just a little bit with use, but is still noticeable.

4.  I didn't notice this while I was outdoors yesterday in good light, but my Tamron is slower to focus on some targets when compared to the Nikon.  Sometimes it seems to take almost 2 seconds to focus.

October 2, 2008 FINAL REPORT:  In my opinion, the Tamron 18-270 is a great daylight lens.  It is sharp over the whole range, color and contrast are excellent.  Unfortunately the slow focus in less than bright light is a show stopper for me.  My Nikon 18-200 had no problem quickly focusing in the same light where the Tamron was slow to very slow.

I have returned the Tamron 18-270 today, got my money back and bought a Nikon 16-85.  I put the Nikon 18-200 on my D80 and the Nikon 16-85 on my D90.  The D90 was the only camera used to compare the Nikon 18-200 and the Tamron 18-270 for these webpage photos.

END OF REPORT


photo: Bikini girls at Atlantic City

site stats